How Can 1984 Be Read and Interpreted Differently?

How can a text word of honor be read and interpreted differently by dickens different refs? 1984by George Orwell (1949) is a political novel pen with the purpose of warning contributors of the dangers of undemocratic political science. The tout ensembleow can be read and interpreted very differently by two different referees, especially when they were born in a different time. In this strain the viewpoint of two Western readers, iodin from 1950 and the other from 2012 will be compared to reckon at the possible difference they could take in in interpreting the story.First of all, the venerate of existenceness watched and controlled is to a greater extent recognizable for a reader in 1950. During World contend II, the media was controlled by the Nazis. Radios for example, unless transmitted positive news for Germany. In order to ensure nobody secretly listened to something else, signs were checked regularly. That was not nevertheless to contact if people listened to an illegal radio-channel but withal to see if they were hiding Jews. When they were founded guilty, they were send to a concentration camp immediately. In the book this is compared with Thought Crime and the Ministry of Love.P 21 theyll pull me in the back of the cope i dont care d birth with plentiful comrade they al miens should you in the back of the neck i dont care down with big brother This is a quote from Winstons diary. level(p) writing something in his own sequestered diary, in his own house is a crime since he didnt go after Big Brother, the Partys leader. The particular that he scribbled it down so right away and full of mistakes shows the solicitude being caught and watched. heartbeat of all, the concern of totalitarian governments was more than germane(predicate) immediately after World War II.The reader in 1950 could easily know the similarities between the totalitarian government of Hitler and the totalitarian government described in 1984. onwards W orld War II Germany was in an economic downturn. Hitler was a magnificent utterer who offered a reason for this occurring he cursed the Jews. No one wants to hear that the hassle with their country are their own so the German accepted this as an answer. In Oceana the same happened P 13 The hatred had started. As usual, the face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the enemy of the people, had flashed onto the screen. The leaders of The Party use the same way to gain power as Hitler did, so readers from 1950 are likely to . For readers in 1950 this is all fresh and easily recognizable and wherefore more relevant than for readers from 2012. Lastly, the attention of being spied on and eavesdropped by telescreens and secret microphones was more realistic to a reader from 1950. That is because slightly 1950 more and more people started to own a television and on that pointfore it became a real possibility that everybodys house would have a telescreen one day. forthwith this fear has become a reality, only in a different way.The government is able to control and check a lot of things through cameras and social media and there is little privacy. But to a reader from 2012 this is not strange or frightening, it is short normal. For this reason you could say the actual fear is not realistic because a reader from 2012 doesnt have to fear it anymore. To conclude, the fear a reader could experience spot reading the book in 1950 is more realistic, more relevant and easier recognizable than the fear possibly experienced by a reader in 2012. Therefore, 1984 can be read and interpreted differently by two different readers who were born in a different time.