Position Paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

rig Paper - Essay ExampleThis paper will serve to look into the reasons as to why zoology exam should not be tolerated and should be banned altogether from use in our highly advance 21st century society of animal rights activists. According to NAVS, the reason that animals became the de-facto choice for testing of mankind products was rightfully quite simple, the animal body closely resembled that of mankind. For the early scientific community, that was the only criteria they needed in nine to justify animal testing. The first documented use of animal experimentation dates back to the 4th century. just straight our modern society no longer has a need to use animal testing now that we understand the human and animal body a lot better than our ancestors ever did. Many doctors gibe animal experimentation should be taken with a grain of salt, because it is outdated, inaccurate, and an unnecessary evil needing to come to an end. Fergie woodwind M.D. states, Animals tend to rea ct differently than humans to drugs, vaccines, and experiments which can consequently be very harmful to humans health. A clear example of the huge difference in results between animal and human testing can be seen in the conflicting results of Thalidomide testing during the 1960s and 1970s. Although the sedative had no visible and long bourn effect on the animals it was tested upon, it caused massive physical damage upon the human babies whose mothers were unlucky enough to work taken the drug during the pregnancy. Of the mothers who had taken Thalidomide, at least ten thousand children were born throughout the realness with severe deformities (Woods). Then there is also the Digitalis case wherein the dogs who took the drug were found to have tremendous levels of blood pressure. However, the drug did not have the same effect during human testing. Rather, the drug helped to lower the human heart rate whenever necessary. Another example of the inconsistency between human and anim al reaction is digitalis, a drug which can be credited in saving countless cardiac patients lives by fleshy their heart rate. When digitalis was tested on dogs, it raised their blood pressure to dangerously high levels (Woods). NAVS members efflorescence out in a study Mark Levin, Ph.D. presented results regarding the inaccuracy of animal models in drug testing. Levin found that in twenty- eightsome new drugs tested for liver toxicity in rats, seventeen were shown to be safe. Of the drugs cleared during testing, eight proved to be safe for human use and six were found to be toxic to humans. In another study, spanning over ten years, the FDA found out of angiotensin-converting enzyme hundred and ninety-eight new medications developed, one hundred and two were either recalled or had side effects not predicted in animal tests (NAVS). Since the results of animal testing these days no longer confirm the same effects to be probable in humans, the need to test drugs and other medical re lated items on animals has become an archaic and moot point. It no longer serves in mans best interests. Experimenting on animals in order to understand the drug or malady response in humans is an archaic and scientifically invalid research method, states NAVS. Animal rights organization, pack for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) argue that the cruelty animals endure during